Son't think that a Chinainan resident
New.
Hem
in the Territory
of the transfer of
JM.S. is either
a
at the
tume
that Tambory
"natural-born" or
a "naturalized" British subject
be ryseverely co
purvision enabling
British subject to ust
regarded by
to
a
to
до
lifer settlement in China under proper pre afflies
cuticised. There 548
webe no objection, I think, to a
the Gov
to release
lifer in order that he may go
nation's
he
Ca
- but he is
though not
A
50
The
Chinese Sod? It would therefore
have
been better to have said sumply :-
"not bring
O
HM,
subject of the
but
I doubt whether the matter is
important mough to
necessary
in views
of
to direct alteration. Still
ow
controvway
the nationality
nuder it
with Chuia
the
of
New
it
would be
!
a
pity to give
care
away by
the question of
Tambory Chinamen,
banishing
Q
few lepers who-according
to our contention - an British subjects
а
A.1.3+24/10
I doubt who begally the inhabitang
either National
of the leased territory
natualized. They have
born or
to our
acending to
niw
be comme
British subject
bynnneration. But the clause (14)
stands. To banish a sick perso
fcem's time an
objectionable
one as it
place like
against his will to to
China is rather a strong order & might
if
& the Gov- is satisfied
that perper care
him.
Singel Daft
ABL
24/10
will be taken of
I agree with her. A&C
M Collins Mr Cox
If
to
for
25°
C
We had head before of this practie
deportation which was
the
in 17884/09 Hayting, the exclame published in the
paper printed Bergen Leprosy Conference of Any 1909.
pranchie
But it was not stated that the was limited to aliens, and I suspect that
There
J
Crys
was
no
aware.
discrimination.
This is the first attempt, so for
to deal
directly with leprosy
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.